- Wait a minute. Aren't you an illustrator? Why the switch to writing?
- Will you be illustrating your own books?
- How does your writing process compare to your art process?
- Is The Book of Joby a Christian fantasy?
- Is the town of Taubolt based on some real place, and if so where?
- Do you have any other novels in the works, or was The Book of Joby it?
- What books or authors have influenced you or your writing?
- Where can I get a copy of your book?
- Is there some way to see you in person, or have you sign my copy of your book?
- Are any of the strange stories one hears about you true?
- Does Holly Black really have a glass eye, or is that just a rumor too?
There I became a much better skier, produced one of the most dreadful fantasy manuscripts ever to darken 800 pages of paper, and, despite all that, discovered there was nothing I had ever enjoyed more than writing - not even skiing.
After that, my friend, Debbie Notkin, a freelance editor of quietly legendary achievement, and an indescribably patient and subtle mentor, took pity on this literary Liza Doolittle, and taught him with astonishing skill and patience to write gooder. As I got gooder, my pleasure in writing increased until the most unpleasant thing about writing was the way my day job as an artist kept interfering. There was simply no further way to deny that writing was truly my last, best heart's desire. I kept at it until I'd managed to write a reasonably decent book. The rest, I hope, will be "history," (as opposed to "toast").
You see, there is another dirty little secret which has helped (perhaps providentially) propel me (quite literally) toward writing at last. In the year 2000, I celebrated the millennium by riding my mountain bike around a sharp hairpin turn into the grill of an oncoming panel truck. I learned three important things that day: always wear a helmet, (I still have the five pieces of mine enshrined at home), never wear a walkman, and if anyone so much as breathes the words, "urinary catheter," shoot first, ask questions later. During the following year, I learned a fourth important thing: some elusive, visceral connection between my head and hand which had made drawing such a ready, reflexive activity had been broken. After considerable effort to 're-learn' this former knack, I finally conceded in 2004 that it was simply not going to come back.
Now, before you go wetting your hanky, let me say that I am happier than ever and feel nothing but fortunate! Though I can no longer do hand-rendered art, I still do digital art quite proficiently. And to be honest, I enjoy writing even more than I enjoyed art even at the peak of my career. I expect to be so absorbed in the writing end of things that the art end will be left very happily to any number of far more talented illustrators - as any truly legitimate author ought to do anyway, mind you.
I don't start a story until I know both how it begins and how it ends. The middle is for discovering as I write my way between those two points. I do usually make an outline of some kind fairly early on, which I regard as a useful crutch to be continuously abandoned as the story itself suggests far better directions and devices to me along the way. Within a month or two after I finish, I usually realize what I should have written, and, so far, seem to need only a month or two more to go back and write that instead. Then all I need is a good editor, (which I have been unspeakably fortunate to have on several occasions now), to pry my eyes the rest of the way open.
I suffer no urge either to champion or to attack any of humanity's vast spectrum of spiritual traditions. There are both very sympathetic and very unsympathetic Christian characters in The Book of Joby, as there are both sympathetic and unsympathetic liberals and conservatives, rich and poor, male and female, etc. Some aspects of the story clearly depart from standard Christian doctrine.
My reasons for writing a fantasy novel so imbued with overtly Judeo-Christian imagery and subject matter really sprouts from an earlier period in my life when I was very intrigued with Native American spirituality. I soon realized that, while I might gain and apply much useful insight from their teachings, these were all crucially underpinned by a whole fabric of innate, even unconscious assumptions and understandings that one not raised Native American, steeped in that culture from the start, was never really going to "grok" as they do. That's when it began to register that the fantasy novels I had read with such enthusiasm since childhood were also usually housed in veneers of some other culture's mythology. In most cases neither the writers nor their American audiences seemed likely to have much visceral understanding of, if even academic familiarity with, the Norse, or Celtic, or Asian mythologies being alluded to. It seemed to me that a lot of potential richness and meaning was being lost by housing our own myths and folktales in skins so devoid of more layered depth to their readers.
That's when I began to think about writing fantasy for an American audience set in our own culture's body of supernatural lore. Could I use this motif to communicate in subtler ways with an audience who would attach all kinds of significance, conscious and otherwise, to details and unspoken allusions they recognized - whether subscribers or not - just by having been raised and formed in the culture woven through with all that lore? Would this be a richer, more nuanced fantasy for its particular audience?
Of course, each reader will attach very different significance, positive and/or negative, to various elements of this "familiar" Judeo-Christian motif, but they will make such attachments as they might not have done via some more unfamiliar context. Thus, I hope my tale might have a richer more varied life independent of anyone's intentions - including mine.
Clearly, a tale imbued with such subject matter cannot avoid suggesting theological statements - intended or otherwise, but I am not trying to write about God or Lucifer here. I don't know either of them nearly well enough to presume much of anything about them worth saying. What I am trying to do is use more familiar archetypes rich with innate associations to tell a story to us, about us and us alone.

